| The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.30 (Linux)
|
![]() |
|
Dating - Printable Version +- Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org) +-- Forum: Madison Motorsports (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Lounge (https://forum.mmsports.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Dating (/showthread.php?tid=7635) |
Re: Dating - G.Irish - 12-04-2009 CaptainHenreh Wrote:Maybe so, but if you ate nothing but McDonald's hamburgers you might think hamburgers suck. Or if you were a foreigner who only experience American fast food you'd think all American food sucks.Sijray21 Wrote:I concede this may be the case however: If this is in fact true then there's a whole shitload of *bad* Indian food.CaptainHenreh Wrote:Indian food tastes like someone ate some mediocre food, shat it out, and sprinkled curry powder on it and served it over rice. I will say this though, I think a lot of little mom and pop ethnic food restaurants end up not being particularly good because the people who start them were not cooks in the first place. And they don't make much effort to improve from there. Then again, that's probably why they stay small mom and pop places. Re: Dating - Ole - 12-04-2009 CaptainHenreh Wrote:Sijray21 Wrote:CaptainHenreh Wrote:...while 12 dollars at (for example because I was there last night) Matchbox gets me a pretty fucking good burger. A fellow SMer is one of the owners at Matchbox. (I assume you are speaking of the Matchbox in DC) Re: Dating - .RJ - 12-04-2009 ^ Pricey, but good restaurant. I like. Shrimp & Grits? Fuck yeah. Re: Dating - Apoc - 12-04-2009 .RJ Wrote:^ Pricey, but good restaurant. I like. Shrimp & Grits? Fuck yeah. I used to love it, but the quality of the place has gone down recently. I used to love their sliders, but last I had them they were extremely sub-par. I do love their shrimp and grits though. Re: Dating - HAULN-SS - 12-04-2009 I didn't take any girl to the track, so must've been someone else. I am thinking of bringing her to the Turducken party. She's only met one or two of my friends, indirectly..I'm not sure how that is really supposed to go down when it's a girl from the interwebs..is that the elephant in the room? Re: Dating - G.Irish - 12-04-2009 HAULN-SS Wrote:I didn't take any girl to the track, so must've been someone else. I am thinking of bringing her to the Turducken party. She's only met one or two of my friends, indirectly..I'm not sure how that is really supposed to go down when it's a girl from the interwebs..is that the elephant in the room?Why would it be? We do everything else over the interwebs, why not meet women that way? That's how I met my current gf. Re: Dating - Sijray21 - 12-04-2009 i think if you show up without her, then she's not real ;-) Re: Dating - Ole - 12-04-2009 HAULN-SS Wrote:I didn't take any girl to the track, so must've been someone else.Aren't you one of the guys that helped me take my motor out? We met again at the NASA race in Oct. (maybe wasn't you?). I forget who you guys are when you don't post your real names...... my memory is slipping in my old age,........what were we discussing? Oh Yeah... HAULN-SS Wrote:I am thinking of bringing her to the Turducken party. She's only met one or two of my friends, indirectly..I'm not sure how that is really supposed to go down when it's a girl from the interwebs..is that the elephant in the room? I would shield her from these guys till you know her better.....
Re: Dating - WRXtranceformed - 12-04-2009 Sooooo..... Is it technically adultery if someone sleeps with someone who is separated but not divorced yet?? Inquiring uh, minds want to know. :lol: Re: Dating - Sijray21 - 12-04-2009 WRXtranceformed Wrote:Sooooo..... not for you :dunno: Re: Dating - G.Irish - 12-04-2009 WRXtranceformed Wrote:Sooooo.....Depends on what the deal is. I think in VA a couple has to be separated for a certain amount of time before they can officially divorce. In that case I guess it wouldn't be adultery. Now if they were on a "break" and they agreed not to sleep with anyone else, that could be considered adultery. Depending on how you look at things it's not necessarily your problem, you're not the one who made the vows. Re: Dating - WRXtranceformed - 12-04-2009 Well yeah. Her ex cheated on her multiple times and they're definitely not getting back together... they're going through mediation right now leading up to their divorce next year. Re: Dating - KPWSerpiente - 12-05-2009 Quote:Is it technically adultery if someone sleeps with someone who is separated but not divorced yet?? For her yes...as a civillian it isn't really going to matter unless she has children she doesn't want to lose custody of. -T Re: Dating - HAULN-SS - 12-05-2009 lol @ all the topics in this thread. I say it depends on how you look at it for that girl..its probably not cheating to the state, but if she's catholic for example, the church won't divorce her probably. Ole - Alan? My name is Derek. I did help you take a motor out that time (i live near summit pt.) but it must not have been me at the other thing..its been a while since I have been to the track. Guess that's true about the interwebs for everything. Found my house and roommate there, have sold multiple cars there...probably not so bad after all. Though, she didn't tell anyone on her side..at least not yet. She claims that her sisters and such would have flipped out and not let her go because of the probably higher danger level the female half has in meeting a guy from the 'net. She said she didn't expect it'd matter anyway, but here we are two months later |