rear wings
#1
Okay, personally I love wings.....Of course it has to look right, but I'm a softy for having these big things on the back of a car....stuff kinda like this
[Image: SRD-BLK.jpg]
[Image: BOMZtypeV_L.jpg]
just wondering how people feel about anything like this
Mouse
  Reply
#2
bling off!
(09-25-2019, 03:18 PM)V1GiLaNtE Wrote: I think you need to see a mental health professional.
  Reply
#3
I prefer the prim and proper look for cars. But I guess you don't see wings on highline vehicles. How much does a wing cost? Would the capital be better served on engine parts? Is there any driving benefit to a wing?
--
Aaron

"Early to bed and early to rise probably indicates unskilled labor." - John Ciardi
  Reply
#4
BassmanGrammy Wrote:I prefer the prim and proper look for cars. But I guess you don't see wings on highline vehicles. How much does a wing cost? Would the capital be better served on engine parts? Is there any driving benefit to a wing?
actually, depending on your specs yes....it does help rear traction (weight) and downforce (with enough speed), but I would work on the engine, then go for the wing...I see too many people just go for looks, and have nothing running under the hood.
Mouse
  Reply
#5
i don't like most wings. I do like most factory wings on cars, but most aftermarket wings just suck.
2010 Dodge Ram 1500
2019 Ford Mustang
  Reply
#6
Ryan T Wrote:i don't like most wings. I do like most factory wings on cars, but most aftermarket wings just suck.
yea, I really only like ones like the ones in the pics I posted......A lot of people try to go funky with em, and it turns out looking bad
Mouse
  Reply
#7
im a fan of the decklid spoiler or mid-wing...but that's about it. and duckbills look hot hot hot on hatchies!
2010 Civic Si
2019 4Runner TRD Off-Road
--------------------------
Past:  03 Xterra SE 4x4  |  05 Impreza 2.5RS  |  99.5 A4 Quattro 1.8T  |  01 Accord EX  |  90 Maxima GXE  |  96 Explorer XLT
  Reply
#8
Those big aluminum wings are wack YO. Don't get them you'll look like a ricer in 5 seconds, no problem. Word.
2017 Mineral White BMW M240i Cabriolet
2014 White Platinum Pearl Explorer Sport

Living in the Alamo City.
210
  Reply
#9
Feersty Wrote:Those big aluminum wings are wack YO. Don't get them you'll look like a ricer in 5 seconds, no problem. Word.
wait a second... did feersty just tell someone how not to be a ricer?!?! :wink:
I'm gonna have to pull THE card...
[Image: ?displaypic=Madison%20Motorsports%2Fauto...PG&non_lr=]

imho I think those wings are horrendous. But hey, don't listen to me or any other naysayers. It only matters how you feel about the ugly, useless, heavy, ricey wing you love on your car. :wink:
My Tumblr
2008 Felt F75 - Pedal Power
  Reply
#10
wings are fun.... airplanes are fast, and wings make your car look like an airplane. therefore... wings make your car fast. How's that for logic.

imho though, wings don't help you, and they ain't cheap, so why bother. You'd be better off buying beer.
2004 C230K 4dr Sport Sedan (6spd Manual)
  Reply
#11
Myuki Wrote:
BassmanGrammy Wrote:I prefer the prim and proper look for cars. But I guess you don't see wings on highline vehicles. How much does a wing cost? Would the capital be better served on engine parts? Is there any driving benefit to a wing?
actually, depending on your specs yes....it does help rear traction (weight) and downforce (with enough speed), but I would work on the engine, then go for the wing...I see too many people just go for looks, and have nothing running under the hood.

That is the reason my CL is going to be cool. I'm going to go completely stock on the outside, but make it very fast. Kinda like a pool shark.

Everytime I see a civic CRX with a big wing and a muffler in which the diameter is equal to the wheel size, I laugh. But what I think is impressive, is to see a car that looks completely stock, out perform any other rice car on the road.

But just for the record, I'm opposed to wings on my vehicles, but I'm all for wings on other cars...for comic relief.
--
Aaron

"Early to bed and early to rise probably indicates unskilled labor." - John Ciardi
  Reply
#12
BassmanGrammy Wrote:I'm all for wings on other cars...for comic relief.
amen
My Tumblr
2008 Felt F75 - Pedal Power
  Reply
#13
BassmanGrammy Wrote:I'm all for wings on other cars...for comic relief.

Altezzas are teh sux also.
2017 Mineral White BMW M240i Cabriolet
2014 White Platinum Pearl Explorer Sport

Living in the Alamo City.
210
  Reply
#14
BassmanGrammy Wrote:I'm all for wings on other cars...for comic relief.

HAHAHAHA, I love that... that's perfect
2004 C230K 4dr Sport Sedan (6spd Manual)
  Reply
#15
[Image: wing.jpg]
Why do people just post what they are thinking? Without thinking.

2012 Ford Mustang
1995 BMW 540i/A
1990 Eagle Talon TSI AWD
  Reply
#16
I think they look great!

...on a car that's prepped correctly for a specific series that allows such a thing. Or even a show car or other highly modified car that's made to emulate the former. If we're talking about a street car, I'm sorry I even chimed in and will go back to biting my tongue. :roll:

And what is that? A wing installed on a chicken? A baby's face? Seriously, wtf is that! :lol:
  Reply
#17
ew
I Am Mike
4 wheels:  '01 RAV4 (Formerly '93 Civic CX, '01 S2000, '10 GTI, '09 A4 Avant)
2 wheels: '12 Surly Cross-Check Custom | '14 Trek Madone 2.1 105 | '17 Norco Threshold SL Force 1 | '17 Norco Revolver 9.2 FS | '18 BMC Roadmachine 02 Two | '19 Norco Search XR Steel (Formerly '97 Honda VFR750F, '05 Giant TCR 2, '15 WeThePeople Atlas 24, '10 Scott Scale 29er XT, '11 Cervelo R3 Rival, '12 Ridley X-Fire Red)

No longer onyachin.
  Reply
#18
if the wing is functional, im all for it. Otherwise, I see no reason for it.
By functional, I don't mean "provides downforce at 170 mph" b/c nothing is going to go that fast short of a prototype car. I like most stock wings, and anything that isn't really obtrusive to the driver's view. IMO, the STi and EVO wings are borderline for me in terms of riceyness, but they match the aggressive tone of the car.
  Reply
#19
JackoliciousLegs Wrote:I'm gonna have to pull THE card...
[Image: ?displaypic=Madison%20Motorsports%2Fauto...PG&non_lr=]

lol
1994 Ford Ranger
2004 Honda S2000
2007 BMW X3
  Reply
#20
Dave Wrote:if the wing is functional, im all for it. Otherwise, I see no reason for it.
By functional, I don't mean "provides downforce at 170 mph" b/c nothing is going to go that fast short of a prototype car.

I agree with Dave on this 100%

please don't be "that car" I see everywhere and laugh at.
1996 BMW 328is white │ 89 BMW 325i track car │84 BMW 325e for sale!│Past: 94 Honda Del Sol S, 2003 Toyota 4Runner V8 Limited, 1996 BMW 328i

e30/e36 parts for sale... PM me
  Reply


Forum Jump: